Financial Appraisal of Railway Projects
By M. Nageswara Rao, www.appendix3exam.com
Source: Chapter II of IR Finance Code Volume I
❖ What is Justification? Justification means the action of showing something to be right or reasonable.
❖ What is Financial? Financial means money, investment etc.
❖ In simple Financial Justification means the money invested should be reasonable or right.
❖ Investment decisions - Most Interesting and most difficult decisions to be made by the Management – for erstwhile Demand No. 16
❖ Fundamental to the Railway system as a commercial undertaking that expenditure incurred on New Assets/Improvement of existing Assets should be financially justified and sanctioned before it is actually incurred.
Exceptions to Financial Justification: 
- Revenue expenditure under erstwhile Demands Nos 1 to 15
 - Unavoidable expenditure on considerations of Safety
 - Passenger amenity works
 - Labour welfare works (however in case of Residential Buildings i.e., Railway quarters – 6 % Assessed Rent is required)
 
Note: However if the above items i.e., 1 to 4 forms a part of the whole scheme - The total cost of the whole scheme inclusive of above works should be financially justified.
❖ Savings of one Zonal Railway at the expense/loss of another Zonal Railway – In such cases, interest of Railways as a whole should be considered for assessment of Financial justification.
❖ No credit should be given to a proposed scheme for saving, which can be achieved regardless of whether the proposed scheme is or is not embarked upon,
Scrutiny by Accounts Officer: 
❖ As a Financial Adviser to the Administration, should carefully scrutinize the justification for proposed expenditure.
❖ While scrutinizing, he/she should refer to Chapter II of Finance Code Volume One, Canons of Financial Propriety and other related instructions received from Railway Board from time to time.
❖ Even in cases, where Rate of Return is not a determining factor, he/she (Financial Adviser) can offer advice on the general merits of proposal in the spirit of a prudent individual spending his/her own money (one of the canons of financial propriety)
Test of Remunerativeness: (Rate of Return)
❖ Minimum of 10 % on Initial Estimated cost.
❖ Exceptions are Assisted Sidings & Residential Buildings (for which separate rules are existed)
❖ Savings in expenditure or increase in net earnings or combination of both.
❖ Interest during construction – should be added to the cost (subject to construction of which is likely to last for more than one year)
❖ Depreciation – ignored as an element of working expenses in Annual Cash flow under DCF Method.
Test of Remunerativeness must for the following ones: 
- New Lines
 - Line Capacity Works
 
A. Gauge conversions
B. Doubling
C. Signaling schemes
D. Provision of Addl Loops / Lengthening of Loops
E. Crossing Stations
F. Strengthening electrical Substations
- Yard remodeling and terminal facilities
 - Microwave & other telecommunication works
 - Change of Traction & provision of Loco Sheds there for
 - Introduction of New services – Passenger trains, container services, street delivery & collection, outagencies
 - Workshops (Production Units & Repair Workshops)
 
❖ Sometimes, it is necessary to reject more economical alternatives (say 20% ROR), because of consideration on which it is difficult to put a precise money value & choose less economical (say 16%) . But reasons should be recorded for resorting to a less economical one.
❖ The Accounts Officer can offer his remarks, if not accept the above proposal.
❖ Sanctioning authorities must pay due consideration of remarks of Accounts Officer before sanctioning such a proposal.
Provision of Rolling Stock:
❖ In New Line constructions & Line Capacity works – Rolling stock investment also added to the Initial cost of the Project before measuring Financial Rate of Return.
❖ Assessed by the Planning Directorate of Railway Board.
Sub-optimization: To realize the optimum benefits for the project by substituting the less remunerative sub works by those anticipated to improve the return further.
Line Capacity works: Master charts should be prepared for
- Existing optimum capacity
 - The extent to which it is presently utilized
 - The capacity expected to be available after provision of proposed facilities.
 
Average Annual Cost consists of 
- Average Annual Cost of Operations – erstwhile Demands 8, 9 & 10
 - Average Annual Cost of Repairs & Maintenance – erstwhile Demands 4, 5, 6 & 7
 - Annual Depreciation charge – erstwhile Demand No. 14
 
Financial Appraisal
Techniques

                          
                       Financial
Statements                                               
Present Value
(Without considering Time
value of Money)                    
(Considering Time value of Money)
             
                                
![]()

DCF – Discounted Cash Flow
Accounting Rate of Return Payback Period
Accounting Rate of Return: (Considering No time value) 
❖ ROR is worked out by arriving at % ratio of Net gain over the initial estimated cost
❖ Net gain = Earnings minus expenses
Example: Calculate Net gain from the following information.
❖ Proposed Building Cost – Rs. 10 Lakhs
❖ At present, Annual rent paying - Rs. 1.5 Lakhs
❖ Annual Maintenance of the Proposed Building – Rs. 50 thousands
❖ Life of the Building – 50 years
❖ Residual/Scrap value at the end of 50 years – Rs. One Lakh
❖ Rate of Depreciation – 3%
Calculation of Net Gain is:
Depreciation = (Rs.10 Lakhs – 1 Lakh) x 3 % = Rs. 9 Lakhs x 3 % = Rs.27000
Maintenance =Rs. 50000
Average Annual Cost = Maintenance plus Depreciation
Average Annual Cost = Rs.50000 + Rs.27000 = Rs. 77000
Net Gain = Annual Rent – Annual Cost
Net Gain = Rs. 150000 – Rs. 77000 = Rs. 73000
Net Gain percentage is 7.3 % (Rs. 73000 on Rs. 10 Lakhs)
   Payback Period Method
❖ Recoupment of the Original investment is an important consideration in appraising a capital investment.
Example: Project Investment is Rs. 1 Lakh
| 
   | 
  
   Project A – Inflows  | 
  
   Project B – Inflows  | 
  
   Remarks  | 
 ||
| 
   Year  | 
  
   Each year  | 
  
   Cumulative  | 
  
   Each year  | 
  
   Cumulative  | 
  
   | 
 
| 
   1  | 
  
   10000  | 
  
   10000  | 
  
   15000  | 
  
   15000  | 
  
   | 
 
| 
   2  | 
  
   12000  | 
  
   22000  | 
  
   16000  | 
  
   31000  | 
  
   | 
 
| 
   3  | 
  
   22000  | 
  
   44000  | 
  
   12000  | 
  
   43000  | 
  
   | 
 
| 
   4  | 
  
   30000  | 
  
   74000  | 
  
   15000  | 
  
   58000  | 
  
   | 
 
| 
   5  | 
  
   20000  | 
  
   94000  | 
  
   16000  | 
  
   74000  | 
  
   | 
 
| 
   6               | 
  
   10000  | 
  
   104000  | 
  
   12000  | 
  
   86000  | 
  
   Project A takes 6 years to Get back its investment  | 
 
| 
   7  | 
  
   10000  | 
  
   114000  | 
  
   10000  | 
  
   96000  | 
  
   | 
 
| 
   8  | 
  
   8000  | 
  
   122000  | 
  
   10000  | 
  
   106000  | 
  
   Project B takes 8 years to Get back its investment  | 
 
| 
   9  | 
  
   5000  | 
  
   127000  | 
  
   15000  | 
  
   121000  | 
  
   | 
 
| 
   10  | 
  
   5000  | 
  
   132000  | 
  
   18000  | 
  
   139000  | 
  
   | 
 
| 
   11  | 
  
   6000  | 
  
   138000  | 
  
   22000  | 
  
   161000  | 
  
   | 
 
| 
   12  | 
  
   12000  | 
  
   150000  | 
  
   19000  | 
  
   180000  | 
  
   | 
 
Outcome:
❖ Compared to Project B, Project A gets back its investment in 6 years. So Project A is selected.
❖ But the drawback in this method is, it ignores the cash inflows of the Total period. If considered, Total period, Project B is having more returns than Project B.
Salient features:
❖ Not considering Time Value of Money
❖ Basis is Payback period.
❖ Rate of Return is not important.
❖ Presently not in vogue in Indian Railways
❖ However there is no bar to application of this method to evaluation of Railway Projects in consultation with PFA.
❖ Suitable in the following cases.
A. Plant & Machinery, where processes or products are likely to be replaced by technological changes within a few years.
B. Single purpose New line where the known reserves of coal, Iron ore etc are expected to be depleted/exhausted after a specified number of years.
  Discount Cash Flow Method:
❖ Considers Time value of Money
●       
Helps determine the value of an investment based
on its future cash flows.
●       
The present value of expected future
cash flows is arrived at by using a discount rate to calculate the DCF.
●       
If the DCF is above the current cost
of the investment, the opportunity could result in positive returns.
● Rs.100 receivable today is more than Rs.100 receivable a year later.
● Hence Rs. 100 received today will earn interest or profits and shall accumulate to more than Rs. 100 in a year's time.
● NPV (Net Present Value) or NPW (Net Present Worth) Method
● Assuming that the Railways' cost of finance say 6% per annum, Rs. 106 received a year hence should be worth Rs.100 today and
● Rs.100 which may be received in a year's time is worth about Rs. 94 today (actually it is worth Rs.94.34).
● Discounted cash flow (DCF) helps determine the value of an investment based on its future cash flows.
● The present value of expected future cash flows is arrived at by using a discount rate to calculate DCF.
● If the (DCF is above the current cost of the investment, the opportunity could result in positive returns.
DCF Method   example
| 
   Year  | 
  
   Outflow  | 
  
   Inflow  | 
  
   Factor@10%  | 
  
   NPV At 10%  | 
  
   Net flow @ 10%  | 
  
   | 
  
   Factor@15%  | 
  
   NPV At 15%  | 
  
   Net flow @ 15%  | 
 
| 
   0  | 
  
   100  | 
  
   | 
  
   1  | 
  
   100  | 
  
   -100  | 
  
   | 
  
   1  | 
  
   100  | 
  
   -100  | 
 
| 
   1  | 
  
   100  | 
  
   | 
  
   0.9091  | 
  
   90.91  | 
  
   -90.91  | 
  
   | 
  
   0.8696  | 
  
   86.96  | 
  
   -86.96  | 
 
| 
   2  | 
  
   100  | 
  
   | 
  
   0.8264  | 
  
   82.64  | 
  
   -82.64  | 
  
   | 
  
   0.7561  | 
  
   75.61  | 
  
   -75.61  | 
 
| 
   3  | 
  
   | 
  
   80  | 
  
   0.7513  | 
  
   60.104  | 
  
   60.104  | 
  
   | 
  
   0.6575  | 
  
   52.6  | 
  
   52.6  | 
 
| 
   4  | 
  
   | 
  
   100  | 
  
   0.683  | 
  
   68.3  | 
  
   68.3  | 
  
   | 
  
   0.5718  | 
  
   57.18  | 
  
   57.18  | 
 
| 
   5  | 
  
   | 
  
   90  | 
  
   0.6209  | 
  
   55.881  | 
  
   55.881  | 
  
   | 
  
   0.4972  | 
  
   44.748  | 
  
   44.748  | 
 
| 
   6  | 
  
   | 
  
   130  | 
  
   0.5645  | 
  
   73.385  | 
  
   73.385  | 
  
   | 
  
   0.4323  | 
  
   56.199  | 
  
   56.199  | 
 
| 
   7  | 
  
   | 
  
   110  | 
  
   0.5132  | 
  
   56.452  | 
  
   56.452  | 
  
   | 
  
   0.3759  | 
  
   41.349  | 
  
   41.349  | 
 
| 
   | 
  
   | 
  
   | 
  
   | 
  
   NPV - Net Present Value  | 
  
   40.572  | 
  
   | 
  
   | 
  
   NPV - Net Present Value  | 
  
   -10.494  | 
 
| 
   Lower Interest Rate  | 
  
   
  | 
  
   
  | 
  
   10  | 
 
| 
   Higher Interest Rate  | 
  
   
  | 
  
   
  | 
  
   15  | 
 
| 
   Difference in Interest Rates (15-10)  | 
  
   
  | 
  
   
  | 
  
   5  | 
 
| 
   Net cash flow at Lower interest Rate i.e.,10%  | 
  
   
  | 
  
   
  | 
  
   40.572  | 
 
| 
   Net cash flow at Higher interest Rate i.e., 15 %  | 
  
   
  | 
  
   
  | 
  
   -10.494  | 
 
| 
   ROR formulae = Lower Rate of Interest + (Higher interest - Lower Interest x Cash flow at Lower Interest/Cash flow at lower interest - Cash flow at higher interest) 
 
  | 
 |||
| 
   ROR = 10 + (5 x 40.572 / 40.572 - ( -10.494) 
 
 
  | 
 |||
| 
   ROR = 10 + 3.97 
  | 
  
   =  | 
  
   13.97%  | 
 |
| 
   ROR = 13.97 %  | 
 |||